Law, Legitimacy and the Rationing of Health Care pdf kindle caj 下载 azw3 umd 电子版 夸克云

Dr Keith Syrett argues for a reappraisal of the role of public law adjudication in questi*** of healthcare rationing. As governments worldwide turn to explicit rationing strategies to manage the mismatch between demand for and supply of health services and treatments, disappointed patients and the public have sought to contest the moral authority of bodies *** rationing decisi***. This has led to the growing involvement of law in this field of public policy. The author argues that, rather than bemoaning this development, those working within the health policy community should recognise the points of confluence between the principles and purposes of public law and the proposals which have been made to address rationing's 'legitimacy problem'. Drawing upon jurisprudence from England, Ca*** and South Africa, the book evaluates the capacity of courts to establish the conditi*** for a process of public deliberation from which legitimacy for healthcare rationing may be derived.

暂无相关目录，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：Law, Legitimacy and the Rationing of Health Care在线阅读

在线听书地址：Law, Legitimacy and the Rationing of Health Care在线收听

在线购买地址：Law, Legitimacy and the Rationing of Health Care在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

书籍介绍

Dr Keith Syrett argues for a reappraisal of the role of public law adjudication in questi*** of healthcare rationing. As governments worldwide turn to explicit rationing strategies to manage the mismatch between demand for and supply of health services and treatments, disappointed patients and the public have sought to contest the moral authority of bodies *** rationing decisi***. This has led to the growing involvement of law in this field of public policy. The author argues that, rather than bemoaning this development, those working within the health policy community should recognise the points of confluence between the principles and purposes of public law and the proposals which have been made to address rationing's 'legitimacy problem'. Drawing upon jurisprudence from England, Ca*** and South Africa, the book evaluates the capacity of courts to establish the conditi*** for a process of public deliberation from which legitimacy for healthcare rationing may be derived.